The challenge and recommendations for scientific project planners and applicants

Based on the experience of the scientists involved in Stuttgart RwLs, we presented an overview of the challenges they faced in the course of the projects.

Concept and organization

  • Good project and financial management.
    • Forward budget planning. A well-equipped project coordination office is important due to the particularly large amount of organization and communication required. Its tasks cover both content-related and operational activities as well as the provision of funding for practice-oriented or civil society partners. The use of voluntary services must not be overstretched.
    • A work, schedule, and cost plan that integrates/promotes co-design by practice-based partners is required as early as the application phase and must respond flexibly to the project dynamics of a Real-World Laboratory.
    • The various daily and weekly rhythms of the scientific and non-scientific project participants must be taken into account. The events can mostly be scheduled for evening or weekends.
    • Allow time and resources for scientific self-reflection, e.g., for ancillary research events and consolidating collaborations with non-scientific/civil society stakeholders (adapting, replicating, perpetuating real-world experiments) – knowledge gain for process optimization.
    • Take a long-term view of the transformative project right from the outset by considering options for making it permanent or transferring it to other organizational and sponsorship models.
  • It is important to develop structures and rules for interdisciplinary knowledge networking and management.
  • Establish a suitable real-lab space for all project partners (from both the scientific and practical sides) as a location for project meetings and events, so that no one has to feel like a "guest ...".

Communication

  • A high degree of internal and external communication is essential, requiring sensitivity and a good knowledge of local conditions, social, and spatial structures.
  • A comprehensive press and public relations effort is required to support the project.
  • To prevent conflicts and disappointments, clarify interests, motivations, and expectations at an early stage, and define problems and goals together.
  • It is also important to find a common language in order to facilitate understanding: it is not uncommon for the same terminology to be used to communicate different ideas. A common denominator is essential for formulating goals.
  • The best way to ensure successful collaborations is to build relationships based on trust and mutual respect.

Competencies and qualification

  • Other important factors are the ability to take on multi-layered roles, to motivate and moderate project managers, to mediate in conflict situations, to act as neutral intermediaries between different knowledge bearers,
  • and to build up competence in participatory, transdisciplinary, and transformative research as well as in participatory science communication throughout the project (capacity building).
  • Soft skills, such as social, interpersonal, and methodological skills, are very important in addition to hard skills, i.e., professional skills,
    • especially a willingness to think outside the box of one's own institutions,
    • as well as the desire to experiment and think differently about the future.
    • One also needs a high tolerance level for errors and frustrations, the ability to handle conflicting objectives and interests
    • in an open and transparent manner, and the ability to engage in dialog.

Evaluation

  • Success criteria measured against the defined objectives must be defined jointly
  • Explore the feasibility of ancillary research
  • The effect of the change and transformation processes can only be observed several years later, thus the potential to evaluate the project following a significant time lag should be put in place.
  • Develop methods and instruments for assessing a project’s societal impact.
To the top of the page